Volume 8 : Issue 1 (2021)

Implementation of Innovative Learning Strategies in Promoting Inclusive Education and its Impact on the Upcoming Generation in India

At present standing in the 21st century, we have come a long way in the world of technology. In the age of modernization, children are deeply involved with various types of technologies. Nowadays most of the higher education institutions are giving a lot of importance to elearning in their teaching learning method. So, the blended learning and flipped learning probably the better ways for delivering teaching learning materials and feedback for the new generation of students in higher level education system. The blended learning design adopted in these programs has involved the thoughtful amalgamation of learning and teaching approaches in both on-campuses, face-to-face and online/virtual learning environments by utilizing the benefits of each of these environments. In flipped learning use revised bloom taxonomy which is related to higher thinking order with the help of online learning.There are so many students pay their volitional and non-volitional attention and fully engaged with online learning in abroad. So far as due to the pandemic situation mostly all of the institutions are going to adapt the blended and flipped learning over traditional learning. It will increase the collaborative and cooperative learning perspective in classroom situation. It will also focus the light on the paradigm shift from traditional learning to blended and flipped learning.

Blended learning, Flipped Learning, Traditional learning, Collaborative learning, Cooperative learning, Virtual learning environment, Online teaching activities, Self-paced learning.

iEverett, D.R. (2015). Adding Value: Online Student Engagement. USA: Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), ISSN: 1545-679X, pp. 68-76. iiBaker, C. (January, 2010). The Impact of Instructor Immediacy and Presence for Online Student Affective Learning, Cognition, and Motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7 (1), 1-30. iiiDixson, M. (June 2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, (10), 2, 1-13. ivDracup, M. (2012). Designing online role plays with a focus on story development to support engagement and critical learning for higher education students. Journal of Learning Design.5(2). Pp. 12-24. vE-Learning Industry Report.(2014). E-Learning Statistics for 2014.Retrieved on June 11, 2014, from http://elearningindustry.com/top-10-elearning-statistics-for-2014-you-needtoknow. viFriedman, L. & Friedman, H. (2013).Using Social Media Technologies to Enhance Online Learning. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1-21. viiSen, T. K. (2011). Blended Learning in Course Delivery and the Student Learning Experience. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology.Vol. 2, No.2. viiiEryilmaz, E., Ryan T., Pol, J. Kasemvilas, S. & Mary, J. (2013).Fostering Quality and Flow of Online Learning Conversations by Artifact-centered Discourse Systems.Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(1), pp. 22-48. ixBergmann, J. &Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, D.C.: ISTE; Alexandria, VA: ASCS. xDeng, Q. (2018). Students’ Attention Assessment in eLearning based on Machine Learning. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 199(3):032042. xiHsieh, Y.H. & Tsai, C.C. (2002).The Effect of Moderator's Facilitative Strategies on Online Synchronous Discussions.Computers in Human Behaviour. 28(5), pp. 1708-1716. xiiSchullo, S. (2005). An analysis of pedagogical strategies: Using synchronous web-based course systems in the online classroom (Unpublished dissertation). University of South Florida. xiiiTromba, P. (2013). Build engagement and knowledge one block at a time with Minecraft. Learning & Leading with Technology. 21-23. xivKar,D., Saha, B.&Mondal. B.C. (2014).Attitude of University Students towards E-learning in West Bengal. Article in American Journal of Educational Research 2(8):669-673 · xvSuthers, D.D. (2001). Collaborative Representations: Supporting Face to Face and Online Knowledge-building Discourse. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui. xviEryilmaz, E., Thoms, B., Mary, J., Kim R. & Pol, J. V. (2014). Attention Guidance in Online Learning Conversations. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 2014, pp. 22-31, doi: 10.1109/HICSS. xviiEryilmaz, E., Ryan T., Pol, J. Kasemvilas, S. & Mary, J. (2013).Enhancing Student Knowledge Acquisition from Online Learning Conversations.International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 8(1), pp. 113-144. xviiiThe International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. May be accessed at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/ind xixThomas, D. & Brown, J. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Self-published by Douglas Thomas and John Seely Brown, 2011, ISBN 13-978-1456458881. xxJimerson, S., Campos, E., & Greif, J. (2003).Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27. xxiCSCs scheme in West Bengal- Maiti, R. K. Jt. Secretary. West Bengal State Rural Development Agency, e-India Conference Delhi. xxiiDas, A., Banerjee, D.K., Basu, K. (2011). Implementation of E-Learning in West Bengal to Enhance the Present GER in Higher Education.International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, Vol. 2, No.3.