kindly submit your paper on hhe@cugujarat.ac.in
Reading, writing and counting /arithmetic are the base of the primary education. Through good reading skill students can learn everything, grasp everything. Due to good reading and comprehension skills positive effect can be put on other subject’s achievement. According to various surveys and assessment programmes the primary level students are weak in this basic skills. Hence the aim of the present study was DEVELOPMENT OF A DIAGNOSTIC REMEDIAL PROGRAMME FOR ATTAINING LEARNING OUTCOMES IN BASIC READING AND COMPREHENSION FROM INITIAL LEVEL UP TO CLASS IV. ’’ For that researcher prepared 40 hours basic reading and comprehension programme. The basic components of reading and comprehension were included in this programme. Forty –two (42) types of activities were constucted in this programme. The reading test and comprehension test were developed by researcher for the study to the effect of remedial programme on attaining learning outcomes in basic reading and comprehension from initial level up to class IV. This is an experimental study with an integration of quantitative as well as qualitative methods of interpretations. One group pretest-posttest design was accepted for this study. There were a pre-test, treatment and posttest and delayed post test for the experimental group. Various descriptive techniques were used for logical analysis and interpretation of qualitative data and t-test for quantitave data. Conclusions of the study suggested that the present Reading-Comprehension remedial programme was significantly effective for attaining learning outcomes in basic reading and comprehension from initial level up to class IV and sustainable too.
Diagnostic remedial programme, learning outcomes
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1994). Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print. Mass: MIT Press, Cambridge. Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Anderson R. (1988). Becoming a Nation of Readers : The report of the commission on reading. Education and Treatment of Children. Vol. 11-4, Nov.1988, pp.389-396. Carrell, P.L. (1988a). Interactive Text Processing: Implications for ESL Second Language Reading Classrooms. In P. Carrell, J. Devine & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to Second Language Reading, pp.239-259), Cambridge University Press, New York. Day, R.R., & J. Bamford. (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Dechant E.(1961). Psychology in teaching Reading. Englewood cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall. Grabe, W. (1991). Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3) 375-406. Harvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse PARMAR : DEVELOPMENT OF A DIGNOSTIC REMEDIAL PROGRAMME FOR ATTAINING Keith Rayner, Barbara Foorman, Charles Perfetti, David Pesetsky, & Mark Seidenberg, (2001). “How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2 (2): 31–74. doi:10.1111/ 1529-1006.00004. Patel, N. (2010). Gujarati Bhashashikshan. Ahmedabad:Gurjar sahitya bhavan. Rumelhart, D. (1977). Towards an Interactive Model of Reading. In S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and Performance IV (pp. 573-603), Academic Press, New York. Tompkins, G.E. (2011). Literacy in the early grades: A successful start for prek- 4 readers.(3rd edition), Boston, Pearson. p 203. Websites http://www.reading.org http://www.jstor.org/stable/42899086 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1423187 http://www.oregoneducation.org/reading/ nichd.html h t t p : / / w w w. n c t e . o r g / b o o k s / 9 8 / Anderson02700.html http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/reading/ ericE565.html http://www.ciera.org
Submit Paper
Subscribe
Help